A Year of Underlying Strength: How earnings growth, AI integration, and resilience shaped 2025 markets

September 24, 2024

Did the US stock market live up to expectations in 2025?

IS A DOUBLE-DIGIT RETURN FOR THE MARKET STILL GOOD ENOUGH, OR HAVE EXPECTATIONS BECOME UNREALISTIC?


Looking back on 2025, the narrative around the US stock market finished somewhat mixed. On the one hand, some analysts noted that it was the worst first year of a Presidential term since 2005, returning 13.3%. However, absent any context, it’s easy for some of the noise to disguise the reality of what was otherwise a robust year.


If we consider calendar year 2025, rather than the goalposts a few weeks to the side of that date, while the market’s returns were down on the preceding two years, the year represented the third consecutive year of double-digit, above-average gains. By most meaningful measures, US equities delivered another year of solid returns, extending an extraordinary bull run that has now outpaced historical averages for multi-year gains. In fact, the S&P 500 finished 2025 sharply in positive territory.


The S&P 500 advanced 16.4%, the Dow Jones increased 13.0%, while the Nasdaq Composite leapt 20.4% on the back of AI enthusiasm. Even after these gains, there are encouraging signs for optimists looking ahead to 2026.


Resilience returns to the fore

Many investors will dwell on the headlines driven by political events and tariff uncertainty from earlier in 2025, but ultimately, the market’s response to those headlines reflects resilience, not weakness. When policy concerns intensified mid-year, stocks oscillated, only to rebound as corporate fundamentals prevailed and sentiment adjusted.


Each of the major US benchmark indices recorded consistent earnings growth throughout the year, underpinned by secular trends such as the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) across industries, and ongoing strength in core economic activity.


Unlike years gone by, the rally was also supported by a broad suite of segments. Yes, tech and growth stocks did lead the charge once again, however, the market’s gains were not exclusively narrow or speculative. Consumer strength, industrial earnings, and sector rotation all contributed meaningfully to the overall performance of the market, which indicates that the rally featured both depth and durability.


Why 2025 was a positive year for investors

All said and done, last year’s market result is a compelling and upbeat outcome. Given the fact that markets are forward-looking, and with indices already deep into a multi-year bull run, the robust returns of 2025 demonstrate underlying confidence in the US economy and growth engines associated with the market’s biggest companies.


Make no mistake, even in the face of headline risks related to politics, policy, inflation, and conflict - among others - investors put their money on the line and yielded handsome returns. Meanwhile, the volatility that characterised certain periods during the year - and arguably capped overall returns for the year - should not necessarily be viewed as a negative in itself.


After all, it is only normal for markets to retrace or correct, before subsequently re-pricing. And that’s effectively what happened, because even in light of said headwinds, the year ended on a high. All up, the S&P 500 reset its record high on 39 occasions across the year.


Add to that, astute investors treated the dips - especially April’s tariff-related pullback - as a buying opportunity that would prove fruitful. From last year’s low, the market advanced more than 50%, which if anything, is just as insightful for a barometer measuring the performance of the benchmark indices in 2025.


Another factor that investors should not overlook is the fact that market fears proved overblown and economic conditions were largely much better than expected. Despite significant protestations, the impact of tariffs on US inflation figures turned out to be relatively negligible.


The Federal Reserve also began to pivot to a more accommodative stance, not only cutting interest rates three times during the year, but signalling an openness to continue doing so, in turn providing further support for risk assets over the coming months. Viewed through these lenses, the market didn’t just hold its own in 2025, it actually fared very well, especially by long-term historical standards.


Will the US economy boom ahead of the midterm elections?

With each of the themes that buoyed returns in 2025 also ‘live’ and likely to be in play through 2026, the case for continued market upside this year is strong. Another tailwind that should not be overlooked is the current administration’s signature ‘One Big Beautiful Bill Act’ that became law in the summer, with its stimulative impact expected to pick up over the coming months.


If anything, it gives some weight to the theory that the government may wish to frontload the economy and let it run ‘hot’ until the midterm elections, scheduled for later this year. That also ties in with the government’s controversial attempts to influence and shape monetary policy, repeatedly calling on the Fed to lower interest rates and even seeking changes to the makeup of the Board that sets rates.


Analysts at the likes of Deutsche Bank are forecasting a near 18% increase for the S&P 500 in 2026, while Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo see the index rounding out the year at 7,800 - still, nearly 1,000 points higher than at the end of 2025. And that leads us to the performance of the market during midterm years. In the vast majority of cases, an incumbent party has lost seats during a midterm, making it a somewhat ‘foreseen’ event priced into markets early in the piece. Markets have often shown some softness during the middle stages of the ‘average’ midterm election year, but historically, US market returns tend to boom after midterms conclude, likely owing to there being less of a policy ‘vacuum’.


The average return in the S&P 500 one year after midterm elections is nearly double that of all other years, supported regardless of the political composition of Congress. Nevertheless, if recent times lend weight to any teachings, the market appears to have become increasingly conditioned to uncertainty associated with Congress. That could redirect the focus back to the key tailwinds around AI, interest rates, and economic resilience. It also imparts another key lesson for investors about discipline.


While uncertainty or volatility may distract from staying the course and remaining disciplined with a long-term focus, 2025 was another year among a growing list of years where discipline and patience rewarded investors and the market knocked it out of the park.

Business
January 29, 2026
Tagged:
Markets

A Year of Underlying Strength: How earnings growth, AI integration, and resilience shaped 2025 markets

Accounting Solutions Tailored to Your Needs, Your Go-To Source for Accounting Knowledge and Tools.

Did the US stock market live up to expectations in 2025?

IS A DOUBLE-DIGIT RETURN FOR THE MARKET STILL GOOD ENOUGH, OR HAVE EXPECTATIONS BECOME UNREALISTIC?


Looking back on 2025, the narrative around the US stock market finished somewhat mixed. On the one hand, some analysts noted that it was the worst first year of a Presidential term since 2005, returning 13.3%. However, absent any context, it’s easy for some of the noise to disguise the reality of what was otherwise a robust year.


If we consider calendar year 2025, rather than the goalposts a few weeks to the side of that date, while the market’s returns were down on the preceding two years, the year represented the third consecutive year of double-digit, above-average gains. By most meaningful measures, US equities delivered another year of solid returns, extending an extraordinary bull run that has now outpaced historical averages for multi-year gains. In fact, the S&P 500 finished 2025 sharply in positive territory.


The S&P 500 advanced 16.4%, the Dow Jones increased 13.0%, while the Nasdaq Composite leapt 20.4% on the back of AI enthusiasm. Even after these gains, there are encouraging signs for optimists looking ahead to 2026.


Resilience returns to the fore

Many investors will dwell on the headlines driven by political events and tariff uncertainty from earlier in 2025, but ultimately, the market’s response to those headlines reflects resilience, not weakness. When policy concerns intensified mid-year, stocks oscillated, only to rebound as corporate fundamentals prevailed and sentiment adjusted.


Each of the major US benchmark indices recorded consistent earnings growth throughout the year, underpinned by secular trends such as the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) across industries, and ongoing strength in core economic activity.


Unlike years gone by, the rally was also supported by a broad suite of segments. Yes, tech and growth stocks did lead the charge once again, however, the market’s gains were not exclusively narrow or speculative. Consumer strength, industrial earnings, and sector rotation all contributed meaningfully to the overall performance of the market, which indicates that the rally featured both depth and durability.


Why 2025 was a positive year for investors

All said and done, last year’s market result is a compelling and upbeat outcome. Given the fact that markets are forward-looking, and with indices already deep into a multi-year bull run, the robust returns of 2025 demonstrate underlying confidence in the US economy and growth engines associated with the market’s biggest companies.


Make no mistake, even in the face of headline risks related to politics, policy, inflation, and conflict - among others - investors put their money on the line and yielded handsome returns. Meanwhile, the volatility that characterised certain periods during the year - and arguably capped overall returns for the year - should not necessarily be viewed as a negative in itself.


After all, it is only normal for markets to retrace or correct, before subsequently re-pricing. And that’s effectively what happened, because even in light of said headwinds, the year ended on a high. All up, the S&P 500 reset its record high on 39 occasions across the year.


Add to that, astute investors treated the dips - especially April’s tariff-related pullback - as a buying opportunity that would prove fruitful. From last year’s low, the market advanced more than 50%, which if anything, is just as insightful for a barometer measuring the performance of the benchmark indices in 2025.


Another factor that investors should not overlook is the fact that market fears proved overblown and economic conditions were largely much better than expected. Despite significant protestations, the impact of tariffs on US inflation figures turned out to be relatively negligible.


The Federal Reserve also began to pivot to a more accommodative stance, not only cutting interest rates three times during the year, but signalling an openness to continue doing so, in turn providing further support for risk assets over the coming months. Viewed through these lenses, the market didn’t just hold its own in 2025, it actually fared very well, especially by long-term historical standards.


Will the US economy boom ahead of the midterm elections?

With each of the themes that buoyed returns in 2025 also ‘live’ and likely to be in play through 2026, the case for continued market upside this year is strong. Another tailwind that should not be overlooked is the current administration’s signature ‘One Big Beautiful Bill Act’ that became law in the summer, with its stimulative impact expected to pick up over the coming months.


If anything, it gives some weight to the theory that the government may wish to frontload the economy and let it run ‘hot’ until the midterm elections, scheduled for later this year. That also ties in with the government’s controversial attempts to influence and shape monetary policy, repeatedly calling on the Fed to lower interest rates and even seeking changes to the makeup of the Board that sets rates.


Analysts at the likes of Deutsche Bank are forecasting a near 18% increase for the S&P 500 in 2026, while Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo see the index rounding out the year at 7,800 - still, nearly 1,000 points higher than at the end of 2025. And that leads us to the performance of the market during midterm years. In the vast majority of cases, an incumbent party has lost seats during a midterm, making it a somewhat ‘foreseen’ event priced into markets early in the piece. Markets have often shown some softness during the middle stages of the ‘average’ midterm election year, but historically, US market returns tend to boom after midterms conclude, likely owing to there being less of a policy ‘vacuum’.


The average return in the S&P 500 one year after midterm elections is nearly double that of all other years, supported regardless of the political composition of Congress. Nevertheless, if recent times lend weight to any teachings, the market appears to have become increasingly conditioned to uncertainty associated with Congress. That could redirect the focus back to the key tailwinds around AI, interest rates, and economic resilience. It also imparts another key lesson for investors about discipline.


While uncertainty or volatility may distract from staying the course and remaining disciplined with a long-term focus, 2025 was another year among a growing list of years where discipline and patience rewarded investors and the market knocked it out of the park.

International

INTERNATIONAL GROWTH PORTFOLIO


With the year coming to a close, the Global Growth Portfolio shed some ground. Overall, Portfolio NAV shrunk by 2.4%, after taking into account foreign exchange movements and account fees.


The Portfolio’s decline contrasted the fortunes of the major US benchmark indices, which recorded more steady, albeit mixed results. For example, the tech heavy Nasdaq Composite fell by 0.5% over the month, although this was the worst performing index among the big three. On the other hand, the S&P 500 inched lower by just 0.1%, while the Dow Jones delivered a monthly gain of 0.7% through December.


As it were, the vast majority of last month’s underperformance was attributable to movements in the Australian dollar against the greenback. Having started the month at an exchange rate of approximately 0.6551, the AUD/ USD pair finished the year at 0.6670. In terms of the impact on the Portfolio, this represented a headwind of approximately 1.8%. This means the monthly performance of our underlying holdings - with forex movements removed - was closer to a decline of 0.6%.


There was a relatively even spread of contributors and underperformers to the performance of the Portfolio last month. While semiconductor stocks rounded out the year on a high - including Nvidia (NVDA), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSM), and ASML Holdings (ASML) - other tech stocks fared less favourably.


Apple (AAPL), Amazon (AMZN), and Microsoft (MSFT), all big contributors to the Portfolio through the year, recorded modest losses through December. Much of this was tied to profit taking, and in our view, represented no tangible influence to the outlook of each company in 2026. In fact, we remain overtly bullish towards mega tech in the coming year, with artificial intelligence (AI) offering an avenue for these companies - and many others - to broaden their revenue streams over the near-to-mid term future.


Elsewhere, defensives like Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) and Costco (COST) proved out of favour in December, which coincided with a period where investors ramped up their bets for further monetary policy relief. This flowed through in a positive manner to some of our holdings, such as BlackRock (BLK), Goldman Sachs (GS), and even Visa (V).


It is our belief that financials could yield a net benefit from expected policy decisions by the Federal Reserve in 2026, albeit we are also not prepared to step away from defensives at this time, as volatility remains a pressing concern for markets.


Still, our optimism for 2026 remains intact, with numerous investment themes potentially set to provide a tailwind to our holdings. By the year’s end, unrealised Portfolio gains represented approximately 44.3% of Portfolio NAV.

Portfolios Review: December 2025


Last month saw both the US and Australian share markets exhibit a continuation of the broader trends that shaped global equities through the year. That meant investor sentiment was driven by shifting monetary policy expectations, sector rotation, and commodity dynamics. In the US, major benchmark indices delivered modest but mixed returns over the month.


The Dow Jones Industrial Average finished December higher, the S&P 500 was broadly flat, while the Nasdaq Composite underperformed, reflecting profit taking in mega-tech names after a strong run. Smaller stocks enjoyed relatively better performance, illustrating a rotation out of some mega-cap options into more cyclical sectors as investors anticipated further rate cuts by the Federal Reserve.


On that point, the Fed delivered a widely expected 25 basis point reduction in December, but the nuance of a divided committee and cautious forward guidance underscored ongoing debate over the pace and scale of future easing. On the ASX, December returns were upbeat, with the S&P/ASX 200 rising modestly.


With that said, the breadth of said gain was somewhat weak, with eight of eleven sectors actually finishing the month in negative territory. Instead, strong gains in the Materials sector, supported by elevated gold and copper prices, as well as resilience across lithium and iron ore segments, provided the impetus for local market strength.


At the other end of the scale, the Information Technology and Health Care sectors were among the worst-performing sectors as investors questioned stretched valuations and earnings prospects. Another factor shaping last month’s action was a strengthening Australian dollar against several major currencies, and domestic bond yields rising.

Mixed returns for Australian equities follows commodities strength.

Australian holdings delivered mixed returns for our suite of Portfolios through December, with results largely influenced by sector composition. That is largely due to the narrow breadth of the market that supported the index rising last month, with the focal point being Materials stocks.


As gold prices continued resetting their all-time highs, and silver followed suit, precious metals were a standout performer across the ASX in December. Similarly, copper prices finished the year on a strong note, providing another tailwind for the segment’s miners. With lithium prices also rallying through the month, and the benchmark for iron ore holding firm, the market’s biggest companies largely bucked a weak offshore lead to support the local market.


Within the Portfolio, the BetaShares Australia 200 ETF (A200) was a bedrock for overall performance, gaining 1.4% over the course of the month. As the composition of A200 closely follows the underlying benchmark index for the local market, its performance was far superior than that of other Australian-focused equities.


For example, both the Betashares Australian Quality ETF (AQLT) and BKI Investment Company (BKI) failed to keep pace with A200, with the pair recording results of -1.1% and 0.0% respectively. As these names held a far more even allocation of assets towards sectors that finished in the red last month, their performances ultimately dragged on each of our Portfolios.

Bank hybrids yield strong returns

An exception to the performance of Australian equities last month centred on the adjacent asset class of hybrids. Across our Portfolios, we hold an array of hybrids tied to the nation’s largest banks, such as Westpac, NAB, and Macquarie Bank.


Through December, this asset class yielded the best performance of any asset on our books, with each holding supporting NAV gains. The key driver for this result was the fact that each hybrid paid out income last month, and with bank hybrids currently offering running yields in the mid-to-high single digits, gains were particularly large. At the same time, there were also favourable dynamics in the fixed income market.


Central to this was the fact that credit spreads were relatively stable through the month. More often than not, this type of pricing dynamic tends to support capital appreciation in addition to the income that hybrids pay, and it is a key factor as to why we have retained exposure to this asset class, and intend to continue doing so for the foreseeable future as an alternative to the likes of cash.

International shares mostly weaker, but exceptions abound as forex weighs

The performance of international equities was not too dissimilar to that of Australian equities in that there were mixed results driven by narrow breadth. With that said, the influence of US shares, which were largely weaker over the month, ensured that the asset class had a net negative effect on our Portfolios in December.


This was most pronounced in our growth-oriented Portfolios, however, there was only a modest performance differential separating the four investment options available to our clients. Nevertheless, across all Portfolios, holdings like the iShares S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and the Betashares Nasdaq 100 ETF (NDQ) weighed on overall NAV, as did the VanEck MSCI International Quality ETF (QUAL).


These were partly offset by currency hedging through holdings in HNDQ and QHAL, which tells us that our underlying holdings did not perform as badly as the headline contribution of the asset class might suggest. Sector rotation was evident through US markets last month, partly led by profit taking. Semiconductor stocks retained their strength toward the year’s end, but other mega-tech names faltered with the finish line in sight.


Even among defensives, there were greater signs of support for financials over staples and industrials, but as has been the case over recent months, investors are likely to be guided by new developments. With this in mind, we see no reason to adjust our allocations to asset classes at this time, and we expect growth assets to outperform when supported by a clearer direction as to monetary policy easing.

Bonds and infrastructure assets end weaker

Despite international market conditions being fairly subdued in terms of equities last month, defensive assets weighed on each of our Portfolios, albeit none more so than our Conservative Portfolio.


Bond holdings, including the Betashares US Treasury Bond 20+ Year Currency Hedged ETF (GGOV) and the Vaneck 1-3 Month US Treasury Bond ETF (TBIL) were both sharply off the pace in December.


The weakness in bonds followed a repricing of interest rate expectations that led to government bond yields surging higher. At the same time, infrastructure assets, which performed remarkably well across the majority of the year, ended 2025 on a soft note.


Both the Vanguard Global Infrastructure Index ETF (VBLD) and the VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (Hedged) ETF (IFRA) contributed steep losses, which coincided with a broader repricing of risk across defensive sectors.

Growthfront Portfolio Performance

Your monthly snapshot of portfolio returns and performance trends.
PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE AS OF 31 DECEMBER  2025
1 month
3 months
6 months
1 year (p.a.)
3 years (p.a)
Haven Portfolio (Conservative)
0.10%
1.10%
4.80%
6.70%
10.70%
Meredian Portfolio (Balanced)
0.00%
1.40%
7.00%
9.00%
15.60%
Summit Portfolio (Growth)
0.10%
1.50%
7.50%
9.50%
16.80%
Aurora Portfolio (High Growth)
0.10%
1.50%
7.90%
10.00%
18.10%
Horizon Portfolio (GlobalGrowth)
-1.60%
0.80%
6.10%
5.10%
18.10%
Performance figures are shown after fees and are based on the underlying returns of each portfolio.
George Wong
Senior Investment Advisor
Follow us on:

Join our newsletter for tips & insights

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Receive the free Growthfront monthly newsletter and updates
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Disclaimer:
Growthfront Pty Ltd is a Corporate Authorised Representative (No. 1302922) of Geosmith Partners AFSL 700062 ABN 86 684 092 135. Any advice contained in this website is general advice only and has been prepared without considering your objectives, financial situation or needs except in circumstances where you have provided your personal financial details via our online application process and received a Statement of Advice from us. Before making any investment decision we recommend that you consider whether it is appropriate for your situation and seek appropriate taxation and legal advice. Please read our Financial Services Guide before deciding whether to obtain financial services from us